Maize is a staple food and source of income in Kenya. However, postharvest losses are estimated at 12% to 20% of the national total output primarily due to high moisture storage. Drying to safe level of 13.5% before storage is essential. One of the main factors which influence drying process is initial moisture content (MC) of the grain. Therefore, this paper presents the effect of initial MC of maize grain on moisture removal rate (MRR) and energy used in drying. The experiments were based on selected initial MC levels of 20%, 25% and 30%, wet basis (wb). The first experiment involved loading experimental vertical pneumatic dryer with 70.0 kg of wet maize grain with initial MC of 20%. The grain was then dried for 2 hours as MRR and energy used monitored at an interval of 15 minutes. The grain and drying air mass flow rate was controlled at 771 kg/h and 547 kg/h, respectively. The plenum chamber air temperature was maintained at 70°C using proportional integral derivative controller. The maize grain variety used was hybrid 614 sourced from a farmer in Njoro sub-County, Nakuru County, Kenya. Similar experiments were repeated but using maize grain with initial MC of 25% and 30%, wb. The MC of 20%, 25% and 30% were obtained by rewetting maize grain with initial MC of 11.4% (wb) in tap water at a temperature of 18°C for 0.75 hours, 1.75 hours and 5.75 hours, respectively. The MRR results ranged from 0.0914 kg/kg.h to 0.0357 kg/kg.h for maize grain with initial MC of 20%, 0.1043 kg/kg.h to 0.0556 kg/kg.h for 25% and 0.1185 kg/kg.h to 0.0705 kg/kg.h for 30%. The energy used for air heating (Ea) for each level of MC was 10.5 kWh. The energy used for grain transportation (Eg) was 4.6 kWh for MC of 20%, 4.8 kWh for 25% and 5.0 kWh for 30%. Data analysis results showed that the initial MC of the maize grain had significant effect (P < 0.05) on MRR. However, the effect of initial MC on Ea and Eg was not significant (P > 0.05).
Published in | Bioprocess Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.be.20220602.15 |
Page(s) | 34-39 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Initial Moisture Content, Maize Grain, Moisture Removal Rate, Energy Used in Drying, Pneumatic Dryer
[1] | Azu, J. (2002). Post-harvest loss reduction: Oici tamale’s quick interventions for reducing food insecurity. Ghana, OICI International. |
[2] | Smale, M., Byerlee, D. & Jayne, T. (2011). Maize revolutions in sub-saharan africa: The World Bank. |
[3] | Cairns, J. E., Hellin, J., Sonder, K., Araus, J. L., MacRobert, J. F., Thierfelder, C. & Prasanna, B. (2013). Adapting maize production to climate change in sub-saharan africa. Food Security, 5 (3), 345-360. |
[4] | FAOSTAT, (2019). Food and agriculture organization of the united nations-statistic division https://www. Fao. Org/faost at/en/# data: QC. |
[5] | Cardona, C., Hodges, R. & Farrell, G. (2004). Common beans: Latin america (Vol. 2). Iowa: Blackwell Publishing Limited. |
[6] | Rehman, Z. U. (2006). Storage effects on nutritional quality of commonly consumed cereals. Food Chemistry, 95 (1), 53-57. |
[7] | De Groote, H., Dema, G., Sonda, G. B. & Gitonga, Z. M. (2013). Maize for food and feed in east africa—the farmers’ perspective. Field Crops Research, 153, 22-36. |
[8] | García-Lara, S. & Serna-Saldivar, S. O. (2019). Corn history and culture (In: Serna-Saldivar, S. O. (Ed.), Corn (Third Edition) ed., pp. 1–18): AACC International Press, Oxford. |
[9] | Verheye, W. (2010). Growth and production of maize: Traditional low-input cultivation Land use, land cover and soil sciences: UNESCO-EOLSS Publishers. |
[10] | FAOSTAT, (2014). Agricultural organization of the united nations, statistics division: Http://faostat3.Fao.Org/browse/q/qc/e. |
[11] | Kirimi, L., Sitko, N., Jayne, T. S., Karin, F., Muyanga, M., Sheahan, M., Flock, J. & Bor, G. (2011). A farm gate-to-consumer value chain analysis of kenya’s maize marketing system. Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development Working Paper, 44. |
[12] | KNBS, G. (2020). Economic survey 2019. |
[13] | Ayertey, J. (1982). Development of sitotroga cerealella on whole, cracked or ground maize. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 31 (2-3), 165-169. |
[14] | Tefera, T., Mugo, S. & Likhayo, P. (2011). Effects of insect population density and storage time on grain damage and weight loss in maize due to the maize weevil sitophilus zeamais and the larger grain borer prostephanus truncatus. |
[15] | Anankware, J., Obeng-Ofori, D., Afreh-Nuamah, K., Oluwole, F. & Ansah, F. (2013). Use of the triple-layer hermetic bag against the maize weevil, sitophilus zeamais (mots) in three varieties of maize. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare, 3 (12), 67-73. |
[16] | Onyango, K. & Kirimi, L. (2017). Postharvest losses: A key contributor to food insecurity in kenya [Press release]. |
[17] | Suleiman, R. A. & Kurt, R. A. (2015). Current maize production, postharvest losses and the risk of mycotoxins contamination in tanzania. Paper presented at the 2015 ASABE Annual International Meeting. |
[18] | FAO. (1992). Maize in human nutrition. Rome (Italy): http://www.fao.org/docrep/t0395e/T0395E00.htm#Contents. |
[19] | Mrema, G. C., Gumbe, L. O., Chepete, H. J. & Agullo, J. O. (2012). Rural structures in the tropics: Design and development: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. |
[20] | Korir, K. & Bii, C. (2012). Mycological quality of maize flour from aflatoxins" hot" zone eastern province–kenya. African Journal of Health Sciences, 21, 143-146. |
[21] | Tiwari, G. N. (2002). Solar energy: Fundamentals, design, modelling and applications: Alpha Science Int'l Limited. |
[22] | Twidell, J. & Weir, T. (2015). Renewable energy resources: Routledge. |
[23] | Barnwal, P. & Tiwari, G. (2008). Grape drying by using hybrid photovoltaic-thermal (pv/t) greenhouse dryer: An experimental study. Solar Energy, 82 (12), 1131-1144. |
[24] | Verma, L. R. (1993). New methods for on-the-farm rice drying: Solar and biomass. Food Science and Technology-New York-Marcel Dekker-, 275-275. |
[25] | Thakur, A. K. & Gupta, A. (2006). Two stage drying of high moisture paddy with intervening rest period. Energy conversion and management, 47 (18-19), 3069-3083. |
[26] | Brooker, D., Bakker-Arkema, F. & Hall, C. W. (1992). Drying and storage of grains and oil seeds: Springer Science and Business Media. |
[27] | Chakraverty, A., Mujumdar, A. S. & Ramaswamy, H. S. (2003). Handbook of postharvest technology: Cereals, fruits, vegetables, tea, and spices (Vol. 93): CRC press. |
[28] | Agrawal, P. K., Agrawal, B. D., Rao, P. V. & Singh, J. (1998). Seed multiplication, conditioning and storage. Maize seed industries in developing countries. Colorado, USA: Lynne Rienner Publishers Inc. |
[29] | Bakker-Arkema, F., DeBaerdemaeker, J., Amirante, P., Ruiz-Altisent, M. & Studman, C. (1999). Cigr handbook of agricultural engineering. Agro-processing engineering (Vol. 4): St Joseph MI. |
[30] | Jain, D. & Tiwari, G. (2003). Thermal aspects of open sun drying of various crops. Energy, 28 (1), 37-54. |
[31] | Jewell, D. C., Waddington, S., Ransom, J. & Pixley, K. (1995). Maize research for stress environments: CIMMYT. |
[32] | Golob, P., Farrel, G. & Orchard, J. (2002). Crop post-harvest: Science and technology. Principles and practice. (Vol. 1): Blackwell science limited. |
[33] | Ajay, C., Orsunil, K. & Deepak, D. (2009). Design of solar dryer with turbo ventilator and fireplace. Paper presented at the International Solar Food Processing Conference. |
[34] | Pelegrina, A. H. & Crapiste, G. H. (2000). Modelling pnumatic drying of food. Journal of Food Engineering, 48 (2001), 301-310. |
[35] | Filková, I. & Mujumdar, A. S. (1995). Industrial spray drying systems. Handbook of Industrial Drying, 1, 263-308. |
[36] | Amer, B. M. A. (1999). Determination of drying rate of fruits as a function of the affecting factors under conditions suiting solar drying. M. Sc. Thesis, Ag. Eng. Dept., Fac. of Agic., Cairo Univ., Egypt. |
[37] | Amer, B. A., Morcos, M. A. & Sabbah, M. A. (2003). New method for the mathematical determination of drying rates of fig fruits depending on empirical data under conditions suiting solar drying. Paper presented at the Deutscher Tropentag. |
[38] | ASAE, (1992). Moisture measurement unground grain and seeds: American Society of Agricultural Engineers Saint Joseph. |
[39] | Bala, B. K. (1997). Drying and storage of cereal grains. Inc., Plymouth, UK: Science Publishers. |
[40] | FAO. (2011). Rural structures in the tropics. Design and development. Rome, Italy. |
APA Style
Meshack Kipruto Korir, Musa Rugiri Njue, Daudi Mongeri Nyaanga. (2022). Effect of Initial Moisture Content of Maize Grain on Moisture Removal Rate and Energy Used in Experimental Vertical Pneumatic Dryer. Bioprocess Engineering, 6(2), 34-39. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.be.20220602.15
ACS Style
Meshack Kipruto Korir; Musa Rugiri Njue; Daudi Mongeri Nyaanga. Effect of Initial Moisture Content of Maize Grain on Moisture Removal Rate and Energy Used in Experimental Vertical Pneumatic Dryer. Bioprocess Eng. 2022, 6(2), 34-39. doi: 10.11648/j.be.20220602.15
@article{10.11648/j.be.20220602.15, author = {Meshack Kipruto Korir and Musa Rugiri Njue and Daudi Mongeri Nyaanga}, title = {Effect of Initial Moisture Content of Maize Grain on Moisture Removal Rate and Energy Used in Experimental Vertical Pneumatic Dryer}, journal = {Bioprocess Engineering}, volume = {6}, number = {2}, pages = {34-39}, doi = {10.11648/j.be.20220602.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.be.20220602.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.be.20220602.15}, abstract = {Maize is a staple food and source of income in Kenya. However, postharvest losses are estimated at 12% to 20% of the national total output primarily due to high moisture storage. Drying to safe level of 13.5% before storage is essential. One of the main factors which influence drying process is initial moisture content (MC) of the grain. Therefore, this paper presents the effect of initial MC of maize grain on moisture removal rate (MRR) and energy used in drying. The experiments were based on selected initial MC levels of 20%, 25% and 30%, wet basis (wb). The first experiment involved loading experimental vertical pneumatic dryer with 70.0 kg of wet maize grain with initial MC of 20%. The grain was then dried for 2 hours as MRR and energy used monitored at an interval of 15 minutes. The grain and drying air mass flow rate was controlled at 771 kg/h and 547 kg/h, respectively. The plenum chamber air temperature was maintained at 70°C using proportional integral derivative controller. The maize grain variety used was hybrid 614 sourced from a farmer in Njoro sub-County, Nakuru County, Kenya. Similar experiments were repeated but using maize grain with initial MC of 25% and 30%, wb. The MC of 20%, 25% and 30% were obtained by rewetting maize grain with initial MC of 11.4% (wb) in tap water at a temperature of 18°C for 0.75 hours, 1.75 hours and 5.75 hours, respectively. The MRR results ranged from 0.0914 kg/kg.h to 0.0357 kg/kg.h for maize grain with initial MC of 20%, 0.1043 kg/kg.h to 0.0556 kg/kg.h for 25% and 0.1185 kg/kg.h to 0.0705 kg/kg.h for 30%. The energy used for air heating (Ea) for each level of MC was 10.5 kWh. The energy used for grain transportation (Eg) was 4.6 kWh for MC of 20%, 4.8 kWh for 25% and 5.0 kWh for 30%. Data analysis results showed that the initial MC of the maize grain had significant effect (P a and Eg was not significant (P > 0.05).}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Initial Moisture Content of Maize Grain on Moisture Removal Rate and Energy Used in Experimental Vertical Pneumatic Dryer AU - Meshack Kipruto Korir AU - Musa Rugiri Njue AU - Daudi Mongeri Nyaanga Y1 - 2022/12/08 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.be.20220602.15 DO - 10.11648/j.be.20220602.15 T2 - Bioprocess Engineering JF - Bioprocess Engineering JO - Bioprocess Engineering SP - 34 EP - 39 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8701 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.be.20220602.15 AB - Maize is a staple food and source of income in Kenya. However, postharvest losses are estimated at 12% to 20% of the national total output primarily due to high moisture storage. Drying to safe level of 13.5% before storage is essential. One of the main factors which influence drying process is initial moisture content (MC) of the grain. Therefore, this paper presents the effect of initial MC of maize grain on moisture removal rate (MRR) and energy used in drying. The experiments were based on selected initial MC levels of 20%, 25% and 30%, wet basis (wb). The first experiment involved loading experimental vertical pneumatic dryer with 70.0 kg of wet maize grain with initial MC of 20%. The grain was then dried for 2 hours as MRR and energy used monitored at an interval of 15 minutes. The grain and drying air mass flow rate was controlled at 771 kg/h and 547 kg/h, respectively. The plenum chamber air temperature was maintained at 70°C using proportional integral derivative controller. The maize grain variety used was hybrid 614 sourced from a farmer in Njoro sub-County, Nakuru County, Kenya. Similar experiments were repeated but using maize grain with initial MC of 25% and 30%, wb. The MC of 20%, 25% and 30% were obtained by rewetting maize grain with initial MC of 11.4% (wb) in tap water at a temperature of 18°C for 0.75 hours, 1.75 hours and 5.75 hours, respectively. The MRR results ranged from 0.0914 kg/kg.h to 0.0357 kg/kg.h for maize grain with initial MC of 20%, 0.1043 kg/kg.h to 0.0556 kg/kg.h for 25% and 0.1185 kg/kg.h to 0.0705 kg/kg.h for 30%. The energy used for air heating (Ea) for each level of MC was 10.5 kWh. The energy used for grain transportation (Eg) was 4.6 kWh for MC of 20%, 4.8 kWh for 25% and 5.0 kWh for 30%. Data analysis results showed that the initial MC of the maize grain had significant effect (P a and Eg was not significant (P > 0.05). VL - 6 IS - 2 ER -