Pollination is an essential process in the production of seed plants, it results in a genetically diverse production of offspring and its role is not well understood and appreciated in the local farming system. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of honeybees pollination on Black cumin seed yield and yield related parameters at Sinana Agricultural Research center at on-station. The study had three experiment; these includes plots caged with honeybees (T1), plots caged without honeybees (T2) and open pollinated plots (T3). All collected data were analyzed using One-way-Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). In the study seven species of insects were identified as Nigella sativa visitors or pollinators with the most frequent visitors were honeybees at 11:30 am time and minimum at 3:00 pm on open pollinated plot. There were no significant different (P>0.05) on Date of blooming, Date of flowering, Flowering period, Primary and secondary branches among the three treatments. Whereas, there were a significant difference (P<0.05) on shading time, Number of capsule, Thousand kernel and total seed yield per hector. In general the present study showed that the highest seed yield/hector was achieved from crops caged with honeybees (20.20Qt/ha) and followed by open pollinated crop (17.54Qt/ha). The result also revealed that about 30.84% of seed yield advantage of Nigella sativa pollinated by honeybees over control/un pollinated by any insect. From this result it was concluded that visits of honeybees at flowering time of Nigella sativa have very helpful in boosting seed yield and yield related components of this crop.
Published in | Bioprocess Engineering (Volume 4, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.be.20200402.12 |
Page(s) | 47-51 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Honeybees, Pollination, Nigella sativa, Yield
[1] | Hammo YH (2008) Effect of high levels of nitrogen and phosphorous fertilizer, pinching, and seed rate on growth and yield components of Nigella sativa L. 1-vegetative growth and seed yield. Mesopotamia J of Agric 36: 1-8. |
[2] | Dafni A, Kevan PG, Husband BC. Practical pollination biology. Cambridge (Ont.). Enviroquest Ltd 2005; 20: 114-28. [https: //www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20053155384]. |
[3] | Klein AM, Vaissière BE, Cane JH, et al. Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops. Proc Biol Sci 2007; 274 (1608): 303-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3721] [PMID: 17164193]. |
[4] | Jivan A. The impact of pesticides on honey bees and hence on humans. Lucr Stiint Zooteh Biotehnol 2013; 46 (2): 272-7. |
[5] | Said F, Inayatullah M, Ahmad S, et al. Foraging behavior of the Himalayan Honeybee, Apis cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae) associated with sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) at Peshawar District of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP). J Entomol Zool Stud 2015; 3 (3): 203-7. |
[6] | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Roubik DW, Adriano-Anaya ML, Campos LA, et al. The Pollination of Cultivated Plants: A Compendium for Practitioners Balboa 2018; 1. |
[7] | Calderone NW. Insect pollinated crops, insect pollinators and US agriculture: Trend analysis of aggregate data for the period 1992-2009. PLoS One 2012; 7 (5): e37235.[http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0037235] [PMID: 22629374]. |
[8] | Amssalu B, Nuru A, Radl off E, Hepburn R. Multivariate morphometric analysis of honeybees (Apis mellifera) in the Ethiopian region. Apidologie (Celle) 2004; 35 (1): 71-81 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/apido: 2003066]. |
[9] | Allsopp MH, de Lange WJ, Veldt man R. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement. PLoS One 2008; 3 (9): e3128 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003128] [PMID: 18781196]. |
[10] | Le Conte Y, Navajas M. Climate change: Impact on honey bee populations and diseases. Rev - Off Int Epizoot 2008; 27 (2): 485-497, 499-510 [http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.27.2.1819] [PMID: 18819674]. |
[11] | Muli E, Patch H, Frazier M, et al. Evaluation of the distribution and impacts of parasites, pathogens, and pesticides on honey bee (Apismellifera) populations in East Africa. PLoS One 2014; 9 (4): e94459 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094459] [PMID: 24740399]. |
[12] | Pashte VV, Said PP. Honey Bees: Beneficial Robbers. Int J Agri Sci Res 2015; 5 (5): 343-52 [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283010724]. |
[13] | Kevan PG. Pollinators as bio indicators of the state of the environment: species, activity, and diversity. Agric Ecosyst Environ 1999; 74: 373-93 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00044-4]. |
[14] | Garibaldi LA, Steffan-Dewenter I, Winfree R, et al. Wild pollinators enhance fruit set of crops regardless of honey bee abundance. Science2013; 339 (6127): 1608-11 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1230200] [PMID: 23449997]. |
[15] | Lautenbach S, Seppelt R, Liebscher J, Dormann CF. Spatial and temporal trends of global pollination benefit. PLoS One 2012; 7 (4): e35954 [http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0035954] [PMID: 22563427]. |
[16] | Alebachew WG. Economic value of pollination service of agricultural crops in Ethiopia: Biological Pollinators. J Apic Sci 2018; 62 (2): 265-73. |
[17] | Shrestha B. Honeybees and Environment. Agriculture and Environment. Gender Equity and Environment Division. In: Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, HMG. Nepal, India 2004; pp. 1-8. |
[18] | Pharaon MA, Dounia Chantal D, Esther NO, Fernand-Nestor TF. Pollination Efficiency of Apis mellifera L.(Hymenoptera: Apidae) on Flowers of Sesamum indicum L.(Pedaliaceae) at Bilone (Obala, Cameroon). Int J Res Stud Agri Sci 2018; 4 (3): 12-20 [http://dx.doi.org/10.20431/2454-6224.0403003]. |
[19] | Panda P, Sontakke BK, Sarangi PK. Preliminary studies on the effect of bee (Apis cerana indica F.) Pollination on yield of sesamum and niger. Indian Bee J 1988; 50: 63-4. |
[20] | Ricciardellid, D. and P. Oddo, 1981. Flora Apistica Italiana. Institution sperimentale zoologia agraria and Federazione italiana apicoltori, Interstampa, Rome. |
[21] | Free, J. B., 1993. Insect Pollination of Crops. Academic Press, London. |
[22] | Hoehn, P., T. Tscharntke, J. M. Tylianakis and I. Steffan-Dewenter, 2008. Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield. Proc. Royal Soc. (B), 275: 2283–2291SARC, 2006. |
[23] | SARC (Sinana Agricultural Research Center), 2020. Annual report. pp. 1-90. |
[24] | Herrera, C. M., 1989. Pollinator abundance, morphology and flower visitation rate: Analysis of the 'quantity' component in a plant pollinator system. Oecologia, 80: 241–248. |
[25] | Oz M, Karasu A, Carkrnak I, Goksoy AT, Turan ZM, 2009. Effect of honeybee (Apis mellifera) pollination on seed set in hybrid Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8 (6): 1037-1043. |
[26] | Munawar, M. S., G. Sarwar, S. Raja, E. S. Waghchoure, F. Iftikhar and R. Mahmood, 2009. Pollination by honeybee (Apis mellifera) increases seed setting and yield in black seed (Nigella sativa). Int. J. Agric. Biol., 11: 611–615. |
[27] | Haftom Gebremedhn and alemayehu Tadesse, 2014. Effect of honeybees (Apis mellifera) pollination on seed of Guizotia abyssinica (L. f.). Afr. J. Agric. Res. Vol. 9 (51), pp 3637-3691. |
[28] | Ignasi Bartomeus, Simon G. Potts, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Bernard E. Vaissi`ere, Michal Woyciechowski, Kristin M. Krewenka, Thomas Tscheulin, Stuart P. M. Roberts, Hajnalka Szentgy orgyi, Catrin Westphaland Riccardo Bommarco (2014), Contribution of insect pollinators to crop yield and quality varies with agricultural intensification. Peer J 2: e328; DOI 10.7717/peerj.328. |
APA Style
Bekele Tesfaye, Temaro Gelgelu, Wodimu Lelisa. (2020). The Effect of Honeybee (Apismellifera) Pollination in Enhancing Yield of Nigella sativa (Darbera Variety) in the High Land of Bale. Bioprocess Engineering, 4(2), 47-51. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.be.20200402.12
ACS Style
Bekele Tesfaye; Temaro Gelgelu; Wodimu Lelisa. The Effect of Honeybee (Apismellifera) Pollination in Enhancing Yield of Nigella sativa (Darbera Variety) in the High Land of Bale. Bioprocess Eng. 2020, 4(2), 47-51. doi: 10.11648/j.be.20200402.12
AMA Style
Bekele Tesfaye, Temaro Gelgelu, Wodimu Lelisa. The Effect of Honeybee (Apismellifera) Pollination in Enhancing Yield of Nigella sativa (Darbera Variety) in the High Land of Bale. Bioprocess Eng. 2020;4(2):47-51. doi: 10.11648/j.be.20200402.12
@article{10.11648/j.be.20200402.12, author = {Bekele Tesfaye and Temaro Gelgelu and Wodimu Lelisa}, title = {The Effect of Honeybee (Apismellifera) Pollination in Enhancing Yield of Nigella sativa (Darbera Variety) in the High Land of Bale}, journal = {Bioprocess Engineering}, volume = {4}, number = {2}, pages = {47-51}, doi = {10.11648/j.be.20200402.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.be.20200402.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.be.20200402.12}, abstract = {Pollination is an essential process in the production of seed plants, it results in a genetically diverse production of offspring and its role is not well understood and appreciated in the local farming system. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of honeybees pollination on Black cumin seed yield and yield related parameters at Sinana Agricultural Research center at on-station. The study had three experiment; these includes plots caged with honeybees (T1), plots caged without honeybees (T2) and open pollinated plots (T3). All collected data were analyzed using One-way-Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). In the study seven species of insects were identified as Nigella sativa visitors or pollinators with the most frequent visitors were honeybees at 11:30 am time and minimum at 3:00 pm on open pollinated plot. There were no significant different (P>0.05) on Date of blooming, Date of flowering, Flowering period, Primary and secondary branches among the three treatments. Whereas, there were a significant difference (P<0.05) on shading time, Number of capsule, Thousand kernel and total seed yield per hector. In general the present study showed that the highest seed yield/hector was achieved from crops caged with honeybees (20.20Qt/ha) and followed by open pollinated crop (17.54Qt/ha). The result also revealed that about 30.84% of seed yield advantage of Nigella sativa pollinated by honeybees over control/un pollinated by any insect. From this result it was concluded that visits of honeybees at flowering time of Nigella sativa have very helpful in boosting seed yield and yield related components of this crop.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Effect of Honeybee (Apismellifera) Pollination in Enhancing Yield of Nigella sativa (Darbera Variety) in the High Land of Bale AU - Bekele Tesfaye AU - Temaro Gelgelu AU - Wodimu Lelisa Y1 - 2020/12/16 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.be.20200402.12 DO - 10.11648/j.be.20200402.12 T2 - Bioprocess Engineering JF - Bioprocess Engineering JO - Bioprocess Engineering SP - 47 EP - 51 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-8701 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.be.20200402.12 AB - Pollination is an essential process in the production of seed plants, it results in a genetically diverse production of offspring and its role is not well understood and appreciated in the local farming system. This study was conducted to evaluate the effect of honeybees pollination on Black cumin seed yield and yield related parameters at Sinana Agricultural Research center at on-station. The study had three experiment; these includes plots caged with honeybees (T1), plots caged without honeybees (T2) and open pollinated plots (T3). All collected data were analyzed using One-way-Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). In the study seven species of insects were identified as Nigella sativa visitors or pollinators with the most frequent visitors were honeybees at 11:30 am time and minimum at 3:00 pm on open pollinated plot. There were no significant different (P>0.05) on Date of blooming, Date of flowering, Flowering period, Primary and secondary branches among the three treatments. Whereas, there were a significant difference (P<0.05) on shading time, Number of capsule, Thousand kernel and total seed yield per hector. In general the present study showed that the highest seed yield/hector was achieved from crops caged with honeybees (20.20Qt/ha) and followed by open pollinated crop (17.54Qt/ha). The result also revealed that about 30.84% of seed yield advantage of Nigella sativa pollinated by honeybees over control/un pollinated by any insect. From this result it was concluded that visits of honeybees at flowering time of Nigella sativa have very helpful in boosting seed yield and yield related components of this crop. VL - 4 IS - 2 ER -